Āé¶¹Ö±²„

This internet browser is outdated and does not support all features of this site. Please switch or upgrade to a to display this site properly.

Research shows GM crops can potentially benefit balance sheet and environment

Copy Link

Āé¶¹Ö±²„ of Technology analysis has highlighted the potential economic and environmental benefits of growing genetically modified (GM) canola in Western Australia.

Researchers James Fisher and Peter Tozer compared Roundup ReadyĀ®, a popular brand of GM canola with non-GM, herbicide resistant and conventional systems of canola.

Dr Fisher said GM canola could provide farmers with economic and environmental benefits because it offered higher yields and reduced herbicide use.

ā€œOur analysis found that the profitability of GM canola was equal or superior to other systems of canola,ā€ he said.Ā 

ā€œWe also found that the estimated environmental impact of GM canola was less than half that of triazine tolerant canola—currently the most widely used system in WA.ā€

Although their data analysis found that GM canola could have a higher environmental impact than some other systems, besides triazine tolerant canola, these are not generally suitable for WA conditions.

ā€œDue to weed burdens, most WA growers are unable to plant some types of canola including conventional systems,ā€ Dr Fisher said.

He said by using less herbicide sprays on the GM canola about five to six per cent less fuel was used which resulted in a one to two per cent reduction in greenhouse emissions.

ā€œIn addition, the herbicides used with GM crops are more environmentally benign in the soil and have shorter half-lives than those they replace,ā€ Dr Fisher said.

He also believes that GM canola could be compatible with WA farming practices.

ā€œGrower surveys in New South Wales and Victoria have highlighted the suitability of GM canola with no-tillage techniques which are used widely in WA,ā€ he said.

Dr Fisher warned that GM canola should not be released in WA with the expectation that it would be a silver bullet for local farmers.

ā€œThe technology must be used in a way that ensures that it will still be a viable tool 10 years from now, and that potential negative effects are minimised,ā€ he said.

ā€œAlso, yield differences must be sufficient to offset trait fee (the charge for the GM seeds), especially in the low rainfall zone.ā€

The data analysis was completed independently, after being commissioned by Monsanto Australia Ltd.

The research compared the economic and environmental impact of Roundup ReadyĀ®, ClearfieldĀ®, imidazolinone tolerant canola and conventional systems by examining the results from farm trials in New South Wales and Victoria in 2008, and experiences in Canada.

Copy Link